Galatians 1:18–19; 1 Corinthians 15:3–8 ↗
Paul says he met Cephas and James. The kinship language around James is central to the debate.
A working bibliography
Every evidence note points to the primary source and, where available, to modern scholarship that supports or challenges the reading. Links open the source publisher or text.
The site’s position is mythicist. The source library includes both arguments for that position and work that challenges it, so readers can check how each claim is being made.
Ancient and early Christian texts
Paul says he met Cephas and James. The kinship language around James is central to the debate.
Read the narrative as a text with its own structure and theological aims.
The passage about the execution of James and the identification of Jesus.
Latin text, translation, and scholarly commentary on the passage.
The passage quoted in the reference site. It is a literary dialogue preserved by a Christian author.
The transmitted text of the Testimonium Flavianum.
Eusebius quotes the passage in the fourth century.
Modern scholarship
An influential book-length academic argument for the mythicist position; its method and conclusions have received substantial criticism.
A scholarly critique of Carrier’s argument. Read it alongside the book rather than treating either as a substitute for the ancient texts.
P52 is a surviving copy of part of John, not the date of the Gospel’s composition. Nongbri argues its handwriting-based date is less precise than often advertised and plausible dates extend into the third century; he does not assign it a single revised year.
An accessible mainstream account of the historical Jesus and the source base.
Discusses the distinct James passage and its manuscript transmission.
An argument that Tacitus may have relied on Christian tradition; it represents a debated position, not settled consensus.
A recent critique of one part of Richard Carrier’s Bayesian argument.
A literary analysis of the dialogue and its polemical material.